I happen to be a total mall rat. All that movement, all those people. All that Stuff. How attractive. A constant murmuring that is both loud and quiet all at once. It's enough o make you go bonkers, laying there on a bench. When you have no money to spend the mall is just a free museum of the present moment, and it cracks your skull. For those of us already cracked, who knows what will get into it. By far the best place to dispossess. By far. I literally just fall right through the floor and get melted. Or crack through the ceiling like the great destructive liberator always wanted. God, I love him. And this is all especially true if you know the right spots to sit.
What better place to put it all than the great invisible agora, the democratic vomitorium of internet? It has to go somewhere; doesn't it?
Expressing expression; :
(E) = -SlogC/(Rx-)
Where Rx- is the potential energy of response, and
S is the articulated-self multiplied by the universal logarithmic constant
aka the total of all prior, current, and potential noise, sound, thought
Speech/thought/expression is negative because it is always in negative force of separation from every other expressive force, while still maintaining its oneness with C
S is always a negative force in relation to C -- the universal constant. C is also for contact, creation. Creation is not a product. Creation is a force. So this system of representing expression lives fully outside of the property relation and/or extractive mathematics.
The force of expression is balanced with an opposite negative force of response. The response is equal, equal of course not being same or identical (response does not have to be speech but rather, the air moving, the passerby not-quite-hearing).
And so expression is rendered into a positive experience, an experience that builds experientially only via negation, division, and in so doing, union. Hence our recognition of expression as additive to an environment, even though all speech is technically an act of receiving and separating (expressed by its negative value).
​
In the physical system of counting,* Constant (C) is a base-0 unit.
​
*The physicality of number systems (physical counting) is a philosophical enumeration system. In this system 0 = 1 because 0 is a single numerical unit. 0 also = 2 (because 0 is also 1 and those are two different numbers, 1+1=2). This process can be repeated 0 = 1, therefore 0 also equals 2, therefore 0 also equals 3 (0,1,2) ad infinitum. This numerical system demonstrates the paradox of nothing as everything. There is thus no possibility of nothing, theoretically, as zero itself contains the infinite process of enumeration by its very existence 0=1=2 etc. This is why the universal constant is expressed numerologically as 0 but indicates 1, not zero. Divining 1 from 0 further begins the process infinite enumeration.
​
